Preserve single ticket
voting
We do not agree with the Press
Citizen’s recent editorial advocating for legislative action to eliminate the
ability to vote for all candidates of a single party by filling in a single
oval. Although there is no evidence to support whether straight ticket voting
negatively affects independent candidates, retention of judges or the outcome
of ballot issues, it seems to us that people who want to vote for or against
something know it when they enter the voting booth and will do so (if they
don't know maybe it's best they not cast an uninformed vote.) Do you want to
vote for all Democrats or all Republicans, but want to vote against the
proposed new jail? Simply fill in one oval for the party of your choice, then
flip your ballot over and fill in the ‘no’ oval on the jail. Do you want to
vote more selectively? Simply go down the list and vote as you want.
Many voters
prefer straight ticket voting; forcing every voter to go down a sometimes long
list of candidates and issues and vote separately for each one would lengthen
the time it takes to vote, lead to longer lines during heavy voter turnout
elections and perhaps discourage some from voting at all. This legislation is promulgated by the Republican Party,
which is working across the country to make it harder for people to vote.
Carol deProsse
Caroline Dieterle
Council says 'no' to garbage container ordinance; good riddance to a bad idea
Prompted by complaints from some residents in the North Side the proposed piece of legislation, which would have required residents to keep their garbage cans behind the building line, appeared on the Council agenda last week. We are glad the Councilors decided to shelve it. This ordinance would have created unnecessary expense for many home owners, would not have solved the problem of some people allowing unsightly trash to bulge out the top of their bin, and it would have punished the many residents who do not over-stuff their garbage containers. Those who recycle and compost do not produce enough garbage to necessitate the behemoth containers the City makes us use and we are already having to haul these monsters back and forth from house to curb; doing this from the back yard would double the insult. Some lots in Iowa City are so small that residents really do not have a choice about where to keep their behemoth containers; in front of the building line is the only or the best and easiest option, particularly for the elderly or infirm.
A few random thoughts on garbage containers:
Carol deProsse
Caroline Dieterle
Council says 'no' to garbage container ordinance; good riddance to a bad idea
Prompted by complaints from some residents in the North Side the proposed piece of legislation, which would have required residents to keep their garbage cans behind the building line, appeared on the Council agenda last week. We are glad the Councilors decided to shelve it. This ordinance would have created unnecessary expense for many home owners, would not have solved the problem of some people allowing unsightly trash to bulge out the top of their bin, and it would have punished the many residents who do not over-stuff their garbage containers. Those who recycle and compost do not produce enough garbage to necessitate the behemoth containers the City makes us use and we are already having to haul these monsters back and forth from house to curb; doing this from the back yard would double the insult. Some lots in Iowa City are so small that residents really do not have a choice about where to keep their behemoth containers; in front of the building line is the only or the best and easiest option, particularly for the elderly or infirm.
A few random thoughts on garbage containers:
Provide a smaller size as an option for many;
No matter how big a can is given to some people they will still overflow it;
Provide
more aesthetically pleasing cans; and
No comments:
Post a Comment